Sothern African Research and Documentation Centre

julius nyerere
Home Objective Zambezi Imercsa SARDC
RESPONDING TO HIV AND AIDS IN THE ZAMBEZI BASIN
SADC Member States have been implementing programmes since the mid-1980s to prevent or reduce the transmission of HIV and other STDs and reduce the socio-economic impact of HIV and AIDS among individuals, families and communities.

The early HIV and AIDS response was mainly centered on raising awareness for behaviour change (abstinence, mutual faithfulness), condom promotion, treatment of STDs as well as clinical and home-based care. These early approaches were predominantly medical and health-focused in nature and largely neglected the participation of other sectors.

There has been a shift, however, from a medical to a more multi-sectoral, participatory and inclusive approach as the epidemic has continued to evolve and its effects have become increasingly cross-cutting. There was a realisation that the health sector alone could not respond to, and cope with the wide-ranging socio-economic consequences.

Regional and national efforts
At the Summit on HIV and AIDS in Maseru in July 2003, SADC leaders approved the establishment of a regional fund for the implementation of the SADC HIV and AIDS Strategic Framework and Programme of Action 2003-2007. They urged international cooperating partners and international development finance institutions to contribute generously to the fund.

The Maseru Declaration on the Fight against HIV and AIDS in the SADC Region reaffirms SADC’s commitment to combating HIV and AIDS through multi-sectoral strategic interventions.

Although there is no joint policy among the eight Zambezi basin states, there are national strategies to tackle the pandemic. According to a SADC report on HIV and AIDS Policies in Southern Africa published in 2002, many countries in the region have elevated HIV and AIDS to national priority status. There is broad consensus in the region that HIV is impacting on health as well as social and economic development and that it requires a collaborative response involving various stakeholders.

All policies reviewed in the 2002 SADC report promoted multi-sectoralism as a core part of their response. There is a movement among SADC countries to uphold the human rights of people living with HIV and AIDS (PLWHA) and to formulate policies in alignment with the United Nations Declaration of Commitment on HIV and AIDS. This builds on the framework provided by the Abuja Declaration and Framework for Action for the Fight Against HIV and AIDS, Tuberculosis and Other Related Infectious Diseases in Africa (April 2001).

The basin countries are also guided by the SADC Health Protocol that has declared HIV and AIDS a regional priority as it a threatens the region’s social, political and economic infrastructure.

A SADC HIV and AIDS Task Force was established in 1999 to develop a strategy and to plan, coordinate, implement and monitor progress of the strategy against the pandemic at a national and regional level. The region’s approach is guided by the SADC HIV and AIDS Strategic Framework for 2000-2004, which has as its major goals to:

  • mitigate the impact of HIV and AIDS;
  • reduce and prevent the incidence of HIV infection amongst the most vulnerable groups in SADC;
  • review, develop and harmonise policies and legislation aimed at prevention and control of HIV transmission.
Almost all the countries in southern Africa have policies on HIV and AIDS issues relating to human rights, voluntary counseling and testing, behaviour changes, condom promotion, prevention of Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs), safe blood, Mother To Child Transmission (MTCT), breast-feeding, care for PLWHA, gender, youth, research and surveillance, poverty, orphans, widows and widowers, and culture.

In an effort to address underlying factors that promote vulnerability to HIV, a number of Zambezi basin countries have established policies to promote gender equality, improve women’s socio-economic status, and address violence against women. Sector-specific policies and strategies to mount HIV control activities vary considerably in the region with respect to:

  • degree of HIV programming within a given line ministry;
  • degree of integration of sector programmes in national HIV and AIDS strategies;
  • degree of coordination to maximise impact across sectors;
  • level of monitoring and evaluation of individual and joint programmes;
  • method of financing multi-sectoral approaches; and
  • which sectors play lead roles.

Webmaster (sardc@sardc.net)