CURRENT ISSUES trade
Conclusions of impact study
Following is a summary, extracted from a recent policy brief by the European Centre for Development Policy Management, of main conclusions of an European Commission study report on the Impact of Introducing reciprocal trade between the EU and SADC.

While, in the long run, SADC would be a natural Regional Economic Partnership Agreement (REPA) partner for the EU, institutional, political and economic constraints make it difficult, if not impossible, for SADC to conclude a REPA in the timescale envisaged by the EU.

The 14 SADC members have made uneven progress towards trade liberalisation, and a lot remains to be achieved before a Free Trade Area (FTA), let alone a customs union, could be in place.

The report suggests the following:

First, extend the EU-South Africa free trade agreement to other SACU members (Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, and Swaziland).

Then, conclude some form of REPA with the three remaining non-LDCs (Mauritius, Seychelles, Zimbabwe), temporarily leaving out six LDCs that are better off outside a REPA. A SADC-wide REPA with the EU might be envisaged beyond 2010. Expected trade creation gains are very small, while trade diversion losses are substantially greater, especially for the Seychelles (2 percent of GDP) and Mauritius (1.7 percent of GDP).

Trade creation gains would arise if inefficient local production in the ACP was displaced by more competitive imports from Europe.

Trade diversion costs would occur if imports from non-EU suppliers

were displaced by European products, although the former are more efficient, because of the preferential treatment given by the ACP to the latter. The agricultural sector would be mostly affected, especially by subsidised European exports.

Estimated losses in government revenues vary, ranging from negligible amounts for the BLNS (Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia and Swaziland) to losses of 9 percent and 8 percent for Mauritius and Tanzania, and 30 percent for the Seychelles.

In the longer term, the report sees positive benefits in a SADC-wide REPA since it would “lock” the SADC countries in their own FTA and underpin regional integration.
In the short term, however, the gradual approach proposed above could be rather detrimental to the process of regional integration.



Is SADC ready for trade reciprocity with the EU?
Opportunities and challenges of   information technology
Co-operation between SADC Central Banks
SADC in pictures
Information technology to propel SADC into next millenium
Opportunities and challenges of information technology
DRC: Stalled peace talks
Conflict in Angola



Issue Contents | Archive | SADC Today | Editorial

All comments and queries to Editorial.
© Copyright 1999. SADC, SARDC, Webmaster
.