PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV AND AIDS
Most of the national policies and plans make clear
statements that they support the human rights of
PLWHA. All condemn the stigmatisation of PLWHA
and state that people should not be discriminated
against on the basis of their HIV status.
Botswana, addressing the rights of people with
HIV and AIDS, recognises that there are both ethical
and pragmatic public health reasons for reducing
stigmatisation and discrimination. It upholds the
principles that PLWHA should be enabled to lead
productive lives of good quality. Botswana’s policy
undertakes to develop legislation to protect these
rights where necessary.
Malawi illustrates the tension that sometimes
exists between the recognition of human rights
and the desire to control HIV transmission
through influencing behaviour. Human rights are
central to Malawi’s response. The third of
Malawi’s ten guiding principles is that PLWHA
have the right to protection against stigmatisation
and discrimination.
The Mozambique Action Plan calls for the
Ministry of Justice to integrate legal aspects of HIV
and AIDS into its ongoing legal reform. Specific
areas mentioned include discrimination against
PLWHA, and inheritance and property rights including
those of orphans. Tanzania’s policy is clear and
explicit on human rights. Persons with HIV infection
with or without AIDS shall be guaranteed all
basic rights such as the right protection of privacy,
to employment, to education and housing.
Zimbabwe frames the problem slightly differently
arguing that the rights and dignity of all people
should be respected, irrespective of their HIV status.
Policies in Botswana, Malawi, and Tanzania all
state that PLWHA should be actively involved in
HIV and AIDS policy formulation. This principle,
which has become known as the Greater
Involvement of People Living with HIV and AIDS
(GIPA) Principle, has been strongly endorsed as an
important part of developing effective, fair and
practical HIV and AIDS policies.
Mozambique states that PLWHA should be a core
part of the national response, being actively
involved in the fight against HIV and AIDS. While
Malawi mentions that NGOs, religious organisations,
CBOs and youth organisations – and PLWHA
– will form the core of implementing agencies.
SADC has prepared a code on HIV and AIDS and
employment: A Human Rights Approach to AIDS
Prevention at Work, which upholds core human
rights principles in respect of employment: non-discrimination
and confidentiality. Botswana’s national
policy sets out the core principles surrounding HIV
and AIDS and employment prohibiting any form of
discrimination against workers infected with HIV.
Tanzania’s policy is very clear on the subject of discrimination
in the workplace. Pre-employment testing
is unnecessary and shall not be required.
Zimbabwe’s guidelines on testing for HIV and AIDS
are dealt with under the Statutory Instrument 202 of
1998 Labour Relations (HIV and AIDS) Regulations,
Sections 4, 5 and 6. Employers do not have the right
to test people for HIV and AIDS and by itself, HIV
infection is not grounds for dismissal.
CONCLUSION
Southern Africa, with the commitment of its leaders,
governments, business community, media and general
population to fight HIV and AIDS is on track and
what is required is concrete follow-ups to the SADC
declaration made in Maseru with programmes of
action implemented in the various priority areas.
|