CURRENT ISSUES

regional integration

SADC's Year 2000 in retrospect

Regional integration is a multi-dimensional process. It is not only subject to different levels of commitment by member countries, but is dependent on divergent socio-economic and political interests at the national, regional and international levels.
      For SADC, the year 2000 provided many developments that can serve to explain the complex nature of regional integration. On the


Trade and Investment Summit such as SAID 2000 were an opportunity to sell the region's potential

 economic front, SADC’s long-conceived free trade area eventually edged closer to being a reality. 
      The Trade Protocol, signed by heads of state and government in 1996, attained the requisite two-thirds ratification in January 2000, allowing it to come into force.
       The free trade area was launched on 1 September 2000. Five countries – Botswana, Lesotho, Mauritius, South Africa and Swaziland – had, as of January, 2001, deposited their instruments of implementation. Other countries are reported to be at various stages of fulfilling this crucial requirement, which is the first stage in bringing down trade barriers over the agreed-upon eight-year period.
      The stage has, however, been set for deeper market integration, despite the slow start to lifting tariff and non-tariff barriers by some member countries. 
      And with international forums such as the Smart Partnership Conference (in Maputo) and the International Herald Tribune Trade and Investment summit (in Windhoek) continuing to bring to dialogue governments and the private sector in SADC, the gap in interests between politicians and business is bound to narrow.
      Through the four-year old Smart Partnership concept — revisited at the September Summit in Maputo — government, private sector and labour representatives use this Malaysia-borrowed model to nurture development ideas. The concept is based on the premise that the three – government, private sector and labour — are indispensable partners in national development.
      Malaysia, which experienced devastating race riots in the 1960s, and the financial turmoil of 1997, has relied on the model and the resilience of its people, to return sanity to the economy. Thus with such a sterling example of how radical home-grown 

seen as arrogant and archaic policies have intensified in the past year, disrupting all their key meetings. 
      Relations between the European Union and ACP (African, Caribbean and Pacific) countries as manifested through the Lomé Agreement, and more recently, the Cotonou Agreement, have shown that developing countries can only win the battle against globalization if they fight as a group.
      SADC countries, along with other ACP states, successfully lobbied for continued preferential access to the EU market, which was granted in June 2000 with the signing in Benin of the Cotonou Agreement, which succeeded Lomé.
      The Cotonou Agreement, named after the Benin city in which it was signed, runs for 20 years. It has four far-reaching components relating to trade, financial and technical cooperation, political dimensions and the involvement of non-state actors.
      The question of which facets of democracy are applicable to which countries dominated election observation in the region this year. In the Zimbabwe June election, African observers including those representing the Organization of African Unity (OAU) and the SADC Parliamentary Forum (an association of 12 parliaments in southern Africa) held sway over their European counterparts.
      In a historic development, the African observer teams declared the Zimbabwe election free and fair while those from Europe and America had a different opinion. The ruling Zimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF) narrowly beat the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) in an election characterized by pre-poll violence.
      Mauritius, which held its election on 11 September 2000, displayed its own brand of democracy. The Indian Ocean island uses an unusual system of choosing its 70-member 

      The three elections however, were criticized by the gender movement in the SADC region, for failing to consolidate gains achieved in previous elections in terms of women’s representation in parliament. In all three cases, the number of women members of parliament either declined or remained stagnant.
      Cognisant of the need to increase the number of women in positions of power, the SADC-PF, in partnership with other institutions, has embarked on a far-reaching programme to engender the institution of parliament in the region. At its plenary assembly in Malawi last October, the Forum set aside time to appraise MPs about the situation of women and men in the region, the same situation that had led to the executive committing it-self to the 1997 Gender and Development Declaration.
      While the successful holding of elections in Mauritius, Tanzania and Zimbabwe has helped buttress democracy in the SADC region, thus help improve waning investor confidence, events in Angola and the Democratic Republic of Congo have worked in reverse.
      In Angola, the peace process remains stalled on a backdrop of declining region-al and international interest. Similarly, in the DRC, the UN has failed to complement regional efforts and is yet to send in a full strength peace-keeping force, almost 18 months after the Lusaka Peace Accord was signed.
      The need for a speedy resolution of the two conflicts was once more under-scored at the SADC Summit in Windhoek, and subsequent extra-ordinary summits, especially on the DRC.
      The DRC peace process, it appears, has been further delayed by the belligerents who in the past year have been trading accusations and counter accusations of violation of the shaky Lusaka Accord.

recovery programmes can put flagging economies on a sound footing, that southern Africans have every reason to emulate the Malaysians.
      And home-grown programmes have become even more important especially in view of how the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have, by their own admission, mishandled economic crises, particularly those in Africa. Over the last two years, the 


SADC consolidated its democracy with three elections in Mauritius, Tanzania and Zimbabwe

IMF surprised many, especially in southern Africa with its decision to sell off gold reserves on the pretext that it would finance debt relief for countries such as Mozambique and Tanzania.
      First, the IMF misled the world. Mozambique’s debt, under the Highly Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) scheme, has not been cancelled but postponed – Mozambique will still repay at some stage. Second, the gold sale by the IMF and other countries of the Group of Seven industrialised countries has plunged far more people into misery than it has helped – international gold prices have tumbled, turning many mining operations, including some of those in SADC, unviable.
      Many gold mines, especially in South Africa and Zimbabwe — two of SADC’s major gold producing countries — have shut down, and more are threatened by the falling bullion prices.
       This paradox has served as a sharp reminder of why civil society has always questioned the secrecy and sincerity of the Bretton Woods institutions, especially on the back of worsening poverty among countries “benefiting” from their programmes. 
      But the globalisation crusade, championed by the Fund, the Bank and the World Trade Organisation, seems to be in troubled times. Mass protests against what are increasingly 

parliament, modelled on the British first-past-the-post elector-al system but with block-vote modifications. 
      Sixty-two members are elected from 20 constituencies where each voter casts three votes for three candidates from each constituency. The island of Rodriques retains two members also by block vote. Eight members are then picked from a list of best losers.
      The Mauritius election, which was held peacefully and declared free and fair by the SADC-PF, was won by an alliance of the Militant Mauritian Movement and the Militant Socialist Movement, ousting the ruling Mauritian Labour Party. 
      In Tanzania, the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi led by President Benjamin Mkapa consolidated its position with a convincing victory over its rivals. Mkapa increased his popular vote from 61.8 percent in 1995 to 71.7 percent this time. 
      While the election on mainland Tanzania was generally smooth, the same could not be said of Zanzibar, where elections in 16 constituencies were postponed for a week after ballot papers went missing. Zanzibar is a semi-autonomous group of islands and its people choose their own president and legislature as well as voting for the Union President and Parliament. The elections on the islands were finally held, confirming CCM candidate Amani Abeid Karume as president.

      But while politicians have some measure of control over the existing conflicts, which inevitably have put a serious dent on the region’s investment out-look, they will keep their fingers crossed there is no repeat of events that shook the region at the beginning of 2000 – the devastating floods. 
      So severe were the floods that Mozambique, the worst hit in the region, had to shelve its post-war reconstruction programme to concentrate on provision of emergency aid, as well as rebuilding damaged roads and other social facilities. 
SADC, which has been cited on many occasions as one of the few regions that have the potential to succeed, stood firm during the difficult time, providing material and moral support to the affected countries. 
      And as more and more of its sectoral protocols come into force, SADC is set to consolidate its efforts toward regional integration in the year 2001, and reclaim its rightful position as a vibrant economic community of 14 countries. 

by Munetsi Madakufamba

.


Issue ContentsIssue Contents | Archive | SADC Today | Editorial

All comments and queries to Editorial.
SADC, SARDC, Web Applications Developer