| CITES recognises elephant conservation efforts
in the Basin by Admire Ndhlovu Elephant range countries in the Zambezi
Basin will continue to trade in elephant
products following recognition of their
conservation efforts by other African range
states at a recent CITES meeting.
The 14th Conference of Parties to the
Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and
Flora, commonly known as CITES, held at
The Hague early June, ended with a decision
to allow Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe
further one-off sales of their ivory stockpiles.
The decision which followed intense negotiations among African
range states paved the way for Botswana to dispose of 70,000kg of their
ivory stocks while Namibia is allowed to sell 50,000 kg and Zimbabwe
15,000 kg of their raw ivory stocks registered by 31 January 2007.
Outside the Basin, South Africa was allowed a one-off sale of 40,000
kg of its ivory stocks.
The agreement also stipulates that once this sale has been completed
no new proposals for further sales from these four countries are to be
considered by CITES during a “resting period” of nine years.
The long-running global debate over the African elephant focused on
the benefits that income from ivory sales may bring to conservation and
to local communities living side by side with elephants. The debate also
focused on concerns that such ivory sales may encourage poaching.
Going to the conference Zambezi River Basin states faced stiff opposition
from some other African range states on their proposal to be
allowed controlled trade in ivory and other elephant products.
The opposition led by Kenya and Mali called for a 20 year ban on all
forms of trade in elephant products. The two countries were arguing
that despite the successful conservation efforts by the Basin states any
trade in ivory would boost elephant poaching.
However, following discussions on the sidelines of the conference a
compromise deal was reached.
“This African solution to an African problem marks a great step
forward for wildlife conservation,” said CITES Secretary-General
Willem Wijnstekers.
“It is good news for the elephant, good news for the people who live
alongside them and good news for regional cooperation in Africa,” said
Wijnstekers.
In 1989 CITES banned trade of ivory as the international demand for
ivory promoted poaching and threatened the survival of some elephant
populations.
In the Zambezi basin, however, sound management has seen an
increase in the elephant populations.
Most countries in the basin now have elephant populations higher
than the range can support.
According to the African Elephant Status Report 2007, produced by
the African Elephant Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival
Commission, southern Africa has the largest number of elephants in
Africa at nearly 321,000.
This is double that for eastern Africa which boasts about 166,500
elephants, mostly in Tanzania.
Zimbabwe has more than 100,000 elephants yet its carrying capacity
is about 40,000.
Botswana has an elephant population of 106,000 which is more than
double the country's carrying capacity of 50,000.
Tanzania has greater carrying capacity but also has a high population
of elephants, which has increased from 55,000 in 1989 to 141,000 in
2006.
It is estimated that by the year 2020, there will be 400,000 elephants
in southern Africa alone, a potentially calamitous situation given the
inability of the natural environment to support existing numbers.
Of particular concern is the combined effect of large elephant populations,
uncontrolled bush fires and climate change impacts on biodiversity
in the Zambezi Basin.
The major effects of the increase in elephant population include soil
erosion, vegetation damage and the loss of biodiversity.
The loss of tree cover causes soil erosion, resulting in siltation of
water points.
With concerns that climate change will cause unreliable rainfall in
the basin this will put more pressure on existing freshwater sources as
competition for water increases especially between the larger mammals
as well as between communities and wildlife.
|