20 Years of 
 

Background
SADC Human Resources Development Sector
Conclusions and comments
Recommendations
References
PDF VERSION
Archive


Front page

Background and Context


The OAU and Lagos Plan of Action

The Organization of African Unity (OAU) summit held in Lagos in April 1980 adopted the Lagos Plan of Action for Economic Development of Africa 1980 -2000. The move was in response to the perceived need for action to provide the necessary political framework for measures to achieve self-sustaining development and economic growth in Africa (OAU, 1980).

In the context of the Lagos Plan, African leaders stressed their commitment to ensuring a central place for human resources development and for the production of skills needed for development in all sectors of the economy. They underlined the need to eliminate illiteracy and to take measures to address the problems of unemployment and underemployment, shortage of particular skills needed for development, the absence of coordination of policies for human resource development, and deficiencies in national educational systems.

The Lagos Plan highlights the contribution of human resources development strategies to the improvement of living standards through increased employment and income generating opportunities. It also focuses on the utilization of indigenous technologies and the promotion of science and technology as a basis for the economic transformation of African societies.

The Lagos Plan of Action calls on OAU member states to cooperate in the development and utilization of regional, sub-regional and international training and research institutions. The plan urges countries to institute frameworks for staff development, supported by requisite financial arrangements, sectoral advisory committees and central advisory councils.

There was SADCC before SADC in 1980 southern African countries that had attained political independence and majority rule, otherwise known as Front-Line States {FLS), convened an "Economic Summit or the Majority-Ruled States of Southern Africa" in Lusaka. That summit created the Southern Africa Development Coordination Conference (SADCC). Consultations on the creation of SADCC continued at the subsequent summit held in Harare, in 1981.

SADCC had two fundamental objectives. First, the couJ}tries wanted to reduce the vulnerability of their economies, which were dependent on apartheid South Africa due to historical links. They were seeking to delink their economies from South Africa and to coordinate their strategies for development as a region. Secondly, the FLS were seeking to coordinate their support of strategies for attaining majority rule in apartheid South Africa and the independence of South West Africa.

According to the Lusaka Declaration 1980 and the Harare Memorandum of Understanding 1981, SADCC was intended to develop into a mobilizing force for the achievement of economic liberation, raising of standards of living and consolidation of freedom, peace, security and social justice within southern Africa.

The principal objectives of SADCC included the creation of links and regional integration, and the mobilization of resources to strengthen policies and strategies for interstate development. Addressing the inaugural session of the Lusaka summit, former Zambian President, Kenneth Kaunda, called for the development of SADCC into a "powerful front against poverty and all its offshoots of hunger, disease, crime, exploitation of man by man."

He further stated that convening SADCC summits would become "our workshop for sharpening our tools, forging new weapons, working out a new strategy and tactics for fighting poverty and improving the quality of life of our peoples." (quoted in Hoppers, 1996). SADCC identified a number of strategic areas for the purpose of coordinating post-independence development initiatives and efforts to reduce the countries' economic dependence on apartheid South Africa.

Infrastructure sectors were identified as priority areas in the initial stage of this cooperation. These included agriculture, transport and communication, industry, trade, energy, and "manpower" development. Regional coordination mechanisms were to be created to promote cooperation in these areas. The late President of Mozambique, Samora Machel, illustrated the nature of the coordination envisaged at the time, in his speech at the Lusaka summit:

" ...We must be conscious of ti1.e fact that we are not presently in condition to create an economic community of the region, but we can from this moment on, take firm steps in some of the areas already identified: agriculture, industry, trade, energy. ..The experience of the Frontline States in the struggle for support of liberation of the oppressed and exploited people of southern Africa taught us that to each one of our initiatives and victories, imperia1is~ responds with new maneuvers. ..." (quoted in Hoppers, 1996)

SADCC transformed into SADC
A decade later, at the 1992 summit held in Windhoek, capital of the newly independent Namibia, the SADCC Heads of State and Government signed a Treaty transforming SADCC into the Southern African Development Community (SADC). The event was a 'culmination of a process, which had fostered the experience of working together and a sense of regional identity. Several of the countries in the region had developed experience at inter country cooperation even prior to the creation of SADCC a decade earlier.

The region was experiencing historical changes. The most important of these changes included the independence of Namibia, the positive steps towards the establishment of majority rule in South Africa; and the trend involving a shift to more market-oriented economic systems in the region. These changes "provided a propitious time to begin the integration process in southern Africa" (SADC, 1993).

The argument was advanced that regional integration would provide a strengthened collective capacity for countries to address problems of national development, and the challenges associated with the changing and complex regional and global environment. SADC leaders saw a clear link between the launch of their organization and the Lagos Plan of Action:

The signing, by the Heads of State and Government of the Organization of African Unity, of the Treaty establishing the African Economic Community, assumed the establishment of strong regional integration groups. These would form the building blocks fur the continental body. SADC is such a building block for southern Africa" (SADC, 1993).

Building on the objectives of the Lusaka Declaration and the Harare Memorandum of Understanding, the Windhoek Treaty reaffIrmed, and sought to strengthen, the principles of sovereignty, solidarity, peace and security, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. It also highlighted the values of equity, balance and mutual benefit, and peaceful settlement of disputes. The countries of the region needed to work together in fostering measures for self-sustaining development and growth.

The SADC Treaty provides a comprehensive framework within which the countries undertake to coordinate, harmonize and rationalize their policies and strategies for sustainable development. It seeks to forge links for the maintenance of a genuine and equitable process of regional integration in the following areas:

  • food security, land and agriculture;

  • infrastructure and services;

  • industry, trade, finance and investment;

  • human resource development, science and technology;

  • natural resources and environment;

  • social welfare, information and culture; and

  • politics, diplomacy, international relations, peace and security.

SADC reinforced the decentralised structure originally adopted by SADCC as a principal feature of its organization. The arrangement, which provided for member states to coordinate specific sectors, made it unnecessary to create a large regional secretariat.

The treaty assigned to member states responsibility for initiating, coordinating, rationalizing, harmonizing and managing sectoral policies and programmes. This approach was to ensure more direct involvement by member states in the implementation of the activities of the organization. Institutionalization of programmes at the regional level was to be preceded by development of concrete activities on the ground rather than the other way round.

Member states would involve non-governmental and civil society organizations in implementing sectoral programmes. The small central secretariat would deal with global and inter sectoral issues.