The concept of "human development" arose in the late
1980s as a cor ollary of the emerging consensus that the definition
of development had to put human beings at the epicentre of any development
process.
The first Global Human Development Report (GHDR) in 1990 opened
with the argument that "the true wealth of a nation is its
people... the objective of development is the cr eation of an environment
which allows people to benefit from a long, healthy and creative
life" (UNDP, 1990: 1), and defined development as the pr ocess
of enlar ging people's choices.
The concept recognised that people's choices are, in principle,
disparate and unlimited. Long and healthy lives, access to knowledge
in or der to r eceive and share information, and opportunities to
obtain income that permits a decent life, represent some of the
basic choices to which most people aspire.
The main challenge, once the concept was articulated, was to find
a measuring mechanism that would cover the social dimensions r epr
esenting people's choices. Clearly this exercise was complex, given
that it is dif ficult, if not impossible, to try to aggregate the
variety of people's choices into one, two or more indicators.
The difficulty was partially over come with the concentration on
what were consider ed the thr ee main dimensions representing choices:
longevity, level of education and economic income, brought together
into a single synthetic index. Thus the Human Development Index
(HDI) was bor n, which, as we shall see later, would come to be
broken down into other indices.
Since then the concept itself has been evolving and incorporating
other dimensions, including gender disparities and more inclusive
measurements of poverty. Recently the concept has incorporated civic
freedoms, the right to social justice, access to basic social services
such as health and education, political participation and general
social well-being in the analysis of development.
The concept and its instruments are in continual transformation
in an effort to capture the richness and complexity of the issues
being analysed as well as the broad development dimensions it intends
to measure.
|